DDS Related Publications

From Dialogic Design Science
Revision as of 03:30, 27 March 2020 by Laouris (talk | contribs) (Created page with " Galvao, A. et al (2019). Triple helix and its evolution: a systematic literature review. JSTPM. 10 (3): 812–833. Laan, A., Madirolas, G., & De Polavieja, G. G. (2017). R...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Galvao, A. et al (2019). Triple helix and its evolution: a systematic literature review. JSTPM. 10 (3): 812–833.

Laan, A., Madirolas, G., & De Polavieja, G. G. (2017). Rescuing collective wisdom when the average group opinion is wrong. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 4, 56.


Malone, T. (2006). The MIT Center of Collective Intelligence. http://cci.mit.edu


Albrecht, K. (2003). Albrect’s law. In: The power of minds at work: Organizational intelligence in action (pp. 3–16). NY: AMACOM

Whyte, W. H. J. (1952). Group think. Fortune, 45, 145–146.

Warfield, J. N. (1995). Spreadthink; explaining ineffective groups. Systems Research, 12(1), 5–14.

Warfield, J. N., & Teigen, C. (1993). Groupthink, clanthink, spreadthink, and linkthink: Decision-making on complex issues in organizations. Fairfax: Institute for Advanced Study of the Integrative Sciences, George Mason University

Miller, G.A. (1956) ‘The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limitations on our capacity for processing information’, Psychology Review, Vol. 63, pp.81–97.


Christakis, A.N. & Bausch, K.B. (2006). How people harness their collective wisdom…, Greenwich CT, Information Age Publishers.

Flanagan, T. R., & Christakis, A. N. (2010). The talking point: Creating an environment for exploring complex meaning. IAP.

Laouris et al (2014). Co-laboratories of Democracy: Best Choices for Designing Sustainable Futures. In Social Systems and Design(pp. 167-183). Springer, Tokyo.

Dye, K. M., & Conaway, D. S. (1999). Lessons learned from five years of application of the CogniScope. Approach to the food and drug administration. Pennsylvania: CWA Ltd.

Banathy, B. H. (1996). Designing Social Systems in a Changing World. NY: Plenum Press.


Warfield, J. N., & Cardenas, A. R. (1994). A handbook of interactive management. Ames: Iowa State University Press.

Floridi, L. (2015). The Online Manifesto: Being Human in a Hyperconnected Era. Springer Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/onlife-original-outcome

Sage, A. (1977). Methodology for large-scale systems. New York: McGraw Hill.

Warfield, J. N. (1973). Participative methodology for public system planning. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 1(2), 187–210.

Özbekhan, H. (1969). Towards a general theory of planning. In E. Jantsch (Ed.), Per- spectives of planning (pp. 47–155). Paris: OECD Publications.

Özbekhan, H. (1970). On some of the fundamental problems in planning. Technological Forecasting, 1(3), 235–240.

Club of Rome. (1970). The predicament of mankind: quest for structured responses to growing world-wide complexities and uncertainties. A proposal. Geneva: Club of Rome. Retrieved 15 Mar 2020. https://www.futureworlds.eu/wiki/The_Predicament_of_Mankind

Özbekhan, Hasan, 2019. The Engagement Axiom. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hasan_Özbekhan#Work

Laouris, Y., Laouri, R., & Christakis, A. N. (2008). Communication praxis for ethical accountability: The ethics of the tree of action: Dialogue and breaking down the wall in Cyprus. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 25, 331–348.

Christakis, A. N. (1996). A people science: The CogniScope system approach, Systems. Journal of Transdisciplinary Systems Sciences, 1(1), 16–19.


Christakis, A. N., & Bausch, K. C. (Eds.). (2006). CoLaboratories of Democracy: How People Harness Their Collective Wisdom to Create the Future. IAP.

Laouris, Y., & Christakis, A. N. (2007). Harnessing collective wisdom at a fraction of the time using structured dialogic design process in a virtual communication context. International Journal of Applied Systemic Studies, 1, 131–153.

Schreibman, V., & Christakis, A. N. (2007). New agora: new geometry of languaging and new technology of democracy: the structured design dialogue process. International Journal of Applied Systemic Studies, 1(1), 15-31.

Flanagan, T. R., & Christakis, A. N. (2009). The talking point: creating an environment for exploring complex meaning. IAP.


Laouris, Y. (2012). The ABCs of the science of structured dialogic design. International Journal of Applied Systemic Studies, 4(4), 239–257.


Laouris, Y., & Michaelides, M. (2018). Structured Democratic Dialogue: An application of a mathematical problem structuring method to facilitate reforms with local authorities in Cyprus. European Journal of Operational Research, 268(3), 918-931.

Laouris Y., Dye K.M.C., Michaelides M., Christakis A.N. (2014) Co-laboratories of Democracy: Best Choices for Designing Sustainable Futures. In: Metcalf G. (eds) Social Systems and Design. Translational Systems Sciences, vol 1. Springer, Tokyo

Ashby, W.R. 1956, An Introduction to Cybernetics, Chapman & Hall, 1956, ISBN 0-416-68300-2 p207. Available online: http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/ASHBBOOK.html Retrieved 15 Mar 2019.

George A. Miller, "The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two", Psych. Rev. 63(2), March, 1956, 81-97.


Herbert A. Simon, "How Big is a Chunk?", Science, 183, February 8, 1974, 482-488.

John N. Warfield, "The Magical Number Three plus Minus Zero", ISGSR meeting, Budapest, June 1987.

Hester, P. T., & Adams, K. M. (2014). Systemic thinking: Fundamentals for understanding problems and messes (Vol. 26). Springer. p.70

Boulding, K. E. (1966). The impact of the social sciences (No. 316). Vakils, Feffer and Simons Private.

Warfield, J. N. (1999). Twenty laws of complexity: Science applicable in organizations. Systems Research and Behavioral Science: The Official Journal of the International Federation for Systems Research, 16(1), 3-40. pg34

Similarity Matrix https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/computer-science/similarity-matrix

Whyte, W. H. J. (1952). Group think. Fortune, 45, 145–146.

Janis, I. (1983). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Warfield, J. N., & Teigen, C. (1993). Groupthink, clanthink, spreadthink, and linkthink: Decision-making on complex issues in organizations. Fairfax: Institute for Advanced Study of the Integrative Sciences, George Mason University.

Tsivacou, I. (1997) ‘The rationality of distinctions and the emergence of power: a critical systems perspective of power in organizations’, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Vol. 14, pp.21–34.

Turrisi, P.A., Ed.,1997. Pragmatism as a Principle and Method of Right Thinking,State University of New York Press, New York.