Transitive Relations: Difference between revisions
From Dialogic Design Science
More actions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
! precedes | ! R | ||
! | |||
|- | |||
| precedes | |||
| if A precedes B, and B precedes C, necessarily A precedes C. This would be true whatever the nature of A, B, and C,although the ideas can be made more precise by thinkingof A, B, and C as events occurring at specific times. | |||
|- | |- | ||
| includes | | includes | ||
| if A includes B, and B includes C, necessarily A includes | | if A includes B, and B includes C, necessarily A includes | ||
|- | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|} | |} | ||
This mathematical definition of transitivity can be | This mathematical definition of transitivity can be | ||
readily interpreted for many contextual relations. | readily interpreted for many contextual relations. | ||