Jump to content
Toggle menu
  • 110 articles
  • 31 files
  • 3 users
  • 841 edits
Dialogic Design Science
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Aristotle's Theory of Substance: Difference between revisions

From Dialogic Design Science
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:


<youtube width="200" height="120">rSMLb4ZTZIU</youtube>
<youtube width="200" height="120">rSMLb4ZTZIU</youtube>
==Being said vs being in==
[[File: Aristotles_Genus_Species_Individual.png|left|300px]]
Being a human exists in virtue of individuals existing.
Example 1: The form of a chair exists and depends on its particulars, i.e., the existence of an actual instance of a chair. Thus the form of the chair is real, it exists and '''''it is in the object''''' or imminent; it is present in the object. See [[Immanent Realism]].
Example 2: There is an animal. This statement is true because there is Socrates, and Socrates is an animal.
In other words we are able to make the claim that there is an animal because we can make the first claim, there is Socrates!




Line 23: Line 35:




==Being said vs being in==
[[File: Aristotles_Genus_Species_Individual.png|300px]]
Being a human exists in virtue of individuals existing.
Example 1: The form of a chair exists and depends on its particulars, i.e., the existence of an actual instance of a chair. Thus the form of the chair is real, it exists and '''''it is in the object''''' or imminent; it is present in the object. See [[Immanent Realism]].
Example 2: There is an animal. This statement is true because there is Socrates, and Socrates is an animal.
In other words we are able to make the claim that there is an animal because we can make the first claim, there is Socrates!


{|class=wikitable  
{|class=wikitable