Aristotle's Theory of Substance: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
 
(23 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
# Form
# Form


{| class="wikitable"
|-
! scope="col"|
! scope="col"| Plato
! scope="col"| Aristotle
|-
! scope="row"| being
| idea
| form
|-
! scope="row"| becoming
| receptacle
| matter
|}
Aristotle finds the resolution to the ancient problem of '''''being''''' and '''''becoming''''' within the distinction of the terms matter and form. Plato believes that <u>being is the ideal object</u> found in the other (ideal) world, whereas <u>becoming is the receptacle</u> or material thing down here.  
Aristotle finds the resolution to the ancient problem of '''''being''''' and '''''becoming''''' within the distinction of the terms matter and form. Plato believes that <u>being is the ideal object</u> found in the other (ideal) world, whereas <u>becoming is the receptacle</u> or material thing down here.  


For Aristotle being and becoming are found in each individual entity. <u>Every substance that there is, contains within it both matter and form</u>.  
For Aristotle being and becoming are found in each individual entity. <u>Every substance that there is, contains within it both matter and form</u>.  


<youtube width="200" height="120">rSMLb4ZTZIU</youtube>
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rSMLb4ZTZIU|||||start=1&end=226&loop=1}}
 


==Being said vs being in==
==Being said vs being in==
[[File: Aristotles_Genus_Species_Individual.png|left|300px]]
[[File: Aristotles_Genus_Species_Individual.png|left|300px]]
Being a human exists in virtue of individuals existing.
Example 1: The form of a chair exists and depends on its particulars, i.e., the existence of an actual instance of a chair. Thus the form of the chair is real, it exists and '''''it is in the object''''' or imminent; it is present in the object. See [[Immanent Realism]].
Example 2: There is an animal. This statement is true because there is Socrates, and Socrates is an animal.
In other words we are able to make the claim that there is an animal because we can make the first claim, there is Socrates!


{|class=wikitable  
{|class=wikitable  
| '''Primary'''
| '''Primary'''
| Socrates  
| Socrates  
| Socrates is an <u>individual</u> human being (OOP equivalent: instance); he is a substance; he continues to exist overtime; has all these distinct characteristics (OOP equivalent: properties) that belong to him.
|-
|-
|'''Secondary'''  
|'''Secondary'''  
| Animal
| Human Animal Mammal ...
| There is a human; there is an animal. <br>The distinction is between an instance (i.e., an individual) in the kind of groups that it belongs.<br>We are talking about one substance (instance) in a variety of different ways.<br>These (e.g., the species he belongs, the genos he belongs etc.) secondary substances exist at  higher level of abstraction.
|}
|}


<hr>'''Being a human exists in virtue of individuals existing'''.


Example 1: The form of a chair exists and depends on its particulars, i.e., the existence of an actual instance of a chair. Thus the form of the chair is real, it exists and '''''it is <u>in</u> the object''''' or immanent; it is present in the object. See [[Immanent Realism]].
Example 2: There is an animal. This statement is true because there is Socrates, and Socrates is an animal.
In other words we are able to make the claim that there is an animal because we can make the first claim, there is Socrates!
<youtube width= "200" height= 110"> obnOtX4qz6M </youtube>
==Conclusion==
{|class=wikitable  
{|class=wikitable  
|style="padding: 10px" | '''Form'''
|style="padding: 10px" | '''Form'''
Line 43: Line 62:




<youtube width= "200" height= 110"> obnOtX4qz6M </youtube>


==References==
==References==


[[Category:Theories]]
[[Category:Theories]]

Navigation menu