35
edits
Principles Toward the Development of Professional Wisdom (view source)
Revision as of 11:40, 25 September 2020
, 25 September 2020no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Heidi Levitt | [[Heidi Levitt]] | ||
<youtube width="400" height="220"> wuhyi5PZ2U8 </youtube> | |||
<youtube width="400" height="220"> dVLyOwNB3ZI </youtube> | |||
==Short Definition== | |||
Wisdom occurs when actors approach problems, either from within the value system of the other (psychotherapists) or from within a social value system (judges). | |||
==Summary Points== | |||
# Wisdom occurs when actors approach problems, either from within the value system of the other (psychotherapists), or from within a social value system (judges). | |||
# Wisdom identification is based within an ontological position of what is real, and an epistemological position on how knowledge can be developed. As these positions shift across eras, the meaning of wisdom can change. | |||
# This project studies the development and functioning of professional wisdom within two professional groups: psychotherapists and judges. | |||
# Create a hierarchical model of wisdom for each profession. | |||
# Wisdom might be enacted and understood in similar ways across these professional groups and why it might adopt different forms at times. | |||
# Collect nominations of wise professionals from across different forms of practice and perspective across the two professions. | |||
# Process nominations and create a database of nomination. | |||
==Text from Wisdom Institute== | ==Text from Wisdom Institute== | ||
The study examines wisdom in the context of the judge’s practice of hearing cases and the psychologist’s practice of psychotherapy. Many study-specific findings have recently emerged. However, cross-disciplinary findings suggest that wisdom occurs when actors set aside their own value systems and approach problems, either from within the value system of the other (psychotherapists), or from within a social value system (judges). The professional’s own values are still brought to bear at certain times, but professional training is an acculturative process in which the adoption of another value system becomes a deeply held personal value. | The study examines wisdom in the context of the judge’s practice of hearing cases and the psychologist’s practice of psychotherapy. Many study-specific findings have recently emerged. However, cross-disciplinary findings suggest that wisdom occurs when actors set aside their own value systems and approach problems, either from within the value system of the other (psychotherapists), or from within a social value system (judges). The professional’s own values are still brought to bear at certain times, but professional training is an acculturative process in which the adoption of another value system becomes a deeply held personal value. | ||